Electronic Journal Publishing: A Reader Version 2.0

Published by INASP, 2001

©INASP 2001

http://www.inasp.info

7.5 EJB: Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
An academic experience with world wide visibility

By: Atilio Bustos Gonzᬥz

E-mail: abustos@ucv.cl

Head of Library System
Universidad Cat󬩣a de Valpara
CHILE

Presented on:
Scientific Communication and Publishing In the Information Age
Oxford Workshop, 10 – 12 May 1999

1. EJB Project in brief

EJB is an international scientific electronic journal (ISSN 0717-3458). It is a national effort coordinated by CONICYT (National Council for Scientific and Technological Research - an Official agency of the Chilean Government) in partnership with Universidada Cat󬩣a de Valpara�, with the purpose to create a new international experimental scientific journal, born in electronic format only.

EJB, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology is free of charge for authors and readers. It publishes in English review articles and research articles related to all areas of Biotechnology, comprising science molecular biology and the chemistry of the biological processes to industrial and environmental aspects, as well as computer applications and international cooperation policies. EJB has an international Editorial Board, whose Honorary Member is Dr. James D. Watson (Nobel Prize of Medicine and Physiology 1962) it is integrated by 73 recognised scientists in 8 main biotechnology areas, representing 24 countries all over the world. The compromise of EJB teem is to agree the code of ethics and conduct for electronic publications, recommended in the Conference of Experts, February 1996 (Joint ICSU Press/UNESCO), in order to “which would spell out the reciprocal obligations of the scientist and community on such matters as peer review, citation, integrity and authentication of material, and archiving”. Is possible visit EJB in and http://ejb.ucv.cl

27.260 visitors have visited this site since November 1997.

As we are aware that individual efforts are not efficient, Chile will participate actively in the Brazilian Scielo Project. (Scientific Electronic Library on Line) [1].

2. EJB in numbers, two years of experience

Pilot project begins in December 1996.

First issue: march 1998. Four issues published until present.

Next issue: December 1999. Articles published: 27 articles.

Annual budget US$20.000. Total project budget for three years US$62.000.

Visitant Statistics www.ejb.org

Mouth

Average # users per day

# users session

% session from USA

April 99

156

4.684

41,28%

March 99

154

2.315

39,89%

February 99

153

1.996

38,60%

January 99

123

1.408

29,33%

December 98

111

1.445

36,26%

November 98

108

1.295

35,91%

October 98

104

523

31,16%

August 98

137

1.069

29,56%

July 98

65

545

44,77%

June 98

16

480

37,50%

May 98

12

363

27,82%

April 98

55

1.322

32,82%

 

Visitant Statistics www.ejb.org

Country

April 98

May 98

June 98

July 98

Aug 98

Oct 98

Nov 98

Dec 98

April 99

USA

434

101

180

244

316

163

465

1.934

524

Chile

139

51

74

43

141

86

77

211

194

UK

31

8

6

13

57

9

48

170

65

Germany

30

27

26

13

36

7

41

94

39

Canada

14

 

35

14

30

6

54

209

25

Brazil

10

2

3

3

11

 

4

43

21

Australia

37

18

13

23

35

6

23

67

20

France

19

1

5

3

19

8

27

80

20

Other

102

43

24

9

95

29

149

613

90

TOTAL

816

251

366

365

740

314

888

3.421

995

Site .org represents 2/3 of the total visitors. Site .cl maintains a similar distribution of origin of visitors in relation to .org site.

Type and quantities of papers published in EJB

 

April 15, 1998

August 15, 1998

Decemb 15, 1998

April 15, 1999

August 15, 1999

Research papers

 

1

2

2

1

Review papers

5

6

9

6

1

Total

5

6

9

6

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Primary mechanisms for quality guaranty

The followings aspects related to quality control were defined at beginning of the project: peer review, citation, integrity and authentication of material, and archiving. In any of these points the appropriate procedures are established. However, in our primary vision the peer review play and important role.

Peer Review

It is important to obtain academic acceptance. It is necessary to establish public procedures of evaluation and mechanisms for objective the referee's opinion (see examples in annexes).

The quality of comments and suggestions of referees is perceived as authors as synonymous of quality. The opinion of authors of reviewed articles, to produce spontaneous comments to others scientists in relation with the level of procedures. In this case is necessary to maintain the anonymity of authors and referees. It is form to produce a virtuous circle.

4. Additional quality control adopted

With the practice experience new problems were detected and so the need to develop additional quality control points.

Systematic verification of citations

A systematic verification, one by one, of citations included in every article. The authors to introduce involuntary mistakes. For this job the support of experimented librarian is very pertinent. The purpose of the citations is to document the source, and to permit the location of the refereed document, however mistakes at this level produce the cut of information generation cycle. This type of mistake gives readers a poor opinion of the journal.

Other recommendations relative to citations practices

Do not use abbreviations (proper of printed versions limits), use in form consistent a standardised and friendly citation set of rules (included URL to others electronic documents).

5. Visibility plan

In this section intent to answer the question of How to make the journals more accessible in my country, regional and international?

Visibility is the result of a set of characteristics present of a journal, and the actions of its editors and publishers, that contribute to the journal to be recognised, read and cited by the scientific community related to the subject area.

A journal without visibility disappears due to several reasons. Poor impact, null level of citation, etc. With poor impact the authors are not willing to contribute with good-quality articles. With bad articles the well-recognised referees not accept work in vain.

The new paradigm of the scientific electronic journal allows us to reconsider the way of making a publication visible. As long as this is not obtained, one cannot ascertain the success of the journal. Electronic publishing also represents a challenge, both to the scientific community and to those responsible for non-profit publishing institutions, and for this way to increase the visibility of their own scientific contributions.

We are only the beginning of a change, the scientists, too many publishers, and others professionals, still move in a Galaxy Gutemberg: bi-dimensional, plain imagination, lineal vision, from left to right. This makes a poor use of hypertext and multimedia options. In parallel, countries on a different side of the world start with the development of telecommunication infrastructures. In Latin-American countries, different national and private organisations create procedures of crowd to get budget to maintain and develop journals, start with technical assistance to improve the quality of publications, beginning with decision to professionalise the publishing activities (in academic and research environment), starting with projects to develop electronic platforms to support electronic publishing. This is only in part a technological change, the main change, is a cultural change to authors, publishers, and readers (all the scientific community).

If one of the initial objectives is to increase the scientific community participation and to promote the acceptability of electronic media; is possible develop different activities integrated in a systematic plan, which including for example: presentations to specialised congress of recognised leaders in the area, support marketing materials (mouse pad, promotional cards, etc.), to invite the most prestigious scientists to editorial board, select the best as possible referees for every article evaluated, to invite the editorial members to write review articles or editorials, and to get the support of local scientific and technological organisations.

Elements of a visibility plan: editorial board composition; presence in abstracts, specialised data bases and international directories; prestigious enterprises to include publicity in journal, journal diffusion, journal language, respect for positive formal aspects of Gutemberg culture, registration the name at local and international level, associate in cooperative national or regional projects to locate in a same place all journals of the same good quality (for example). Scielo Project).

Front to visibility and acceptability the most efficient answer is quality.

6. Marketing plan

It includes all the elements to increase the visibility of the journals. It is the right combination of marketing of paper-based journals with new options of the digital world. In others words, it is a combination of traditional accepted marketing activities in the academic and research environment with innovative strategies.

It is to develop a marketing plan, requiring of specialists, with academic and commercial experience.

It is not possibly to apply and magic formula to obtain good results in this activity. However, it is positive the marketing activities of others journals to evaluate with benchmarking methodologies.

7. Financial plan and cost policies

This section answers the question of how to reduce production and distribution costs?

Publishing an electronic journal implies create a multidisciplinary work team. This team requires well-prepared members in scientific publishing, electronic edition, quality control, infographics, marketing and financial activities. It is possible to cover different activities with free-lance personnel. However, for the experience and quality required, it is convenient to maintain permanent team.

The cost of producing an electronic journal is very similar to the paper edition. The difference of cost concentrates in dramatic cut printing and distribution costs. Increase the initial investment in computer equipment and operational cost to maintain a computer server connected to Internet. In our case of EJB, the direct incremental cost of every new article published in this first two years is approximate US$2000, our thinking is possible reduce to US$1000 in one year. This estimate does not include deep cost.

Prising in electronic media is possible, however is not easy control a subscription access without participation of intermediaries. One option is maintain the journal free of charge. In this case to missing this economic resource. When cut the printing version; cut the interchange with others equivalent publications. The question ?s the good quality the material received in exchange?

It is possible to think in innovative forms of financial journals. No charges to authors, for publishing or include images or multimedia applications. No charge for subscriptions. It is possible to obtain economic resources of advertising. It is necessaries to maintain one level of not-extreme invasive advertising. It is possible to obtain economic resources of local institutions and internationals grants.

8. Conclusions

To produce an electronic journal in developing countries is not equal a second class journal. The electronic media and cyberspace is a great opportunity to obtain visibility, with rigorous procedures of quality and continuous improvements.

In words of Subbiah Arunachalam, the “classical sociology of science tells us that science is universal, anyone anywhere can contribute to knowledge in the sciences and irrespective of who said it the new finding, if it is reasonable, will be accepted or at least taken seriously by all. This is the basis of the system of information exchange.”

Annex 1.

Guidelines for manuscript evaluation

General Policy

Electronic Journal of Biotechnology publishes research and review papers on all aspects of biotechnology which have not been previously published, except in the form of an abstract or preliminary note, and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

It covers molecular biology, genetic engineering, microbial biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, animal biotechnology, marine biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, biotechnology of human disorders, process biotechnology, industrial applications and biotechnology policy issues. Manuscripts concerning multidisciplinary research are particularly welcomed.

Code of Ethics of Editors

The Journal adheres to a Code of Ethics :

  • All manuscripts are received by the editor and should be considered a confidential document.
  • All research papers, including those of the editor or members of the editorial board, will be subjected the same review process. All of them will be handled anonymously and submitted to peer review omitting authors names and affiliations.
  • The editor or members of the editorial board are not to be involved in their own manuscript evaluation or in the evaluation of manuscripts emanating from their own department
  • Under no circumstances the editor should contact the authors to discuss matters related with the manuscript
  • Under no circumstances the editor and the referees must refer, in conversation or in print, to the work that the manuscript describes before it has been published. Neither should the information it contains be used for advancement of the own work
  1. Evaluation of manuscripts
  1. Papers are sent to three referees, which will evaluate the manuscript according to the following aspects:
  2. Originality of the work
  3. Relevance to scientific knowledge in biotechnology
  4. Background: Theoretical background, adequate hypothesis, objectives and clear contribution to biotechnology. Updated and quality references (75% or more references from the last decade)
  5. Methodology: Materials and methods appropriate and adequately described. Sound experimental design
  6. Results: data concise and sufficient. Statistics analysis when appropriate. Efficiency measurements. Figures clear and correct, only essential data should be included in figures. Elimination of figures, graphs and tables which add little or could be replaced by a few sentences or a statement of numerical values is recommended