25 yearsResearch and knowledge at the heart of development

Skip to content Register Log in

Cascading and travelling training programmes

We often adopt a travelling methodology that has proved to be successful in a range of previous training programmes run by INASP. Details of this approach are outlined below in terms of: process; materials and facilitators; monitoring and support; relative benefits of the travelling methodology.

The Process

Workshop One: Country A

The first workshop is run in country A, the workshop is facilitated by a visiting expert facilitator (in this case this may be a member of INASP or someone identified locally). Assisting the lead facilitator will be an assistant facilitator from country A - this assistant should be familiar with the subject matter and (ideally) an experienced trainer or workshop facilitator. Attending the workshop will be approximately 20 local participants plus an observer from country B - who will eventually act as a facilitator in country C.

Workshop Two: Country B

The second workshop in the programme will be run in country B (1-3 months after the first workshop). The workshop will be facilitated by Workshop One's assistant facilitator, assisted by the observing participant from Workshop One. Approximately 20 local participants will attend the workshop. Additionally, an observer from country C will attend the workshop to familiarise themselves with the content and process.

Workshop Three: Country C

The third workshop in the programme will be run in country C (1-3 months after the second workshop). The workshop will be facilitated by Workshop Two's assistant facilitator, assisted by the observing participant from Workshop Two. Approximately 20 local participants will attend the workshop. Additionally, an observer from country D will attend the workshop to familiarise themselves with the content and process.

Each additional workshop is conducted on the same basis, cascading from one country or location to the next. So, each person taking part in facilitating a workshop will firstly travel to attend a workshop as a participant, then act as assistant facilitator in their own country, before travelling to the next country to act as facilitator. 

In-country cascade

The same methodology can be applied within each country, allowing additional national or local training events to be developed with relative ease. The materials, facilitators and expertise will now all be in place to help facilitate cascade training within the country. INASP are available to help encourage (with advice, guidance and occasionally, small amounts of funding) this in-country cascade. It is felt that the local capacity building effects that this approach has, combined with the significant cost benefit (when compared to other forms of workshop) are significant. So much so, that we try to facilitate this kind of workshop whenever the methodology and content are suitable to local demand and conditions.


Cascaded training graph

Materials and facilitators

Obviously, two very important aspects that will help ensure the success of these kind of workshops are the materials used during the workshops and, perhaps more importantly, the facilitators who will lead each workshop. Choosing the right person is very important and INASP seeks the advice and recommendations of each partner organisation participating in the training, as well as drawing on our network of suitable contacts.


The choice of facilitator is very important and for each workshop programme INASP provide a skills outline that the facilitator should be expected to have. The partner organisation will then select someone appropriate from their staff to act in this role. This will usually be someone with a combination of appropriate experience, training responsibilities and subject knowledge. One of the important outcomes of the workshops is the development of an experienced and skilled group of trainers who can then undertake follow-on training. The development of generic training skills is an important capacity building effect of the individual workshop series.

For more information see our workshop guidelines.


A full set of workshop facilitator's notes and accompanying materials are supplied to the lead and assistant facilitator in advance of each workshop. These include copies of the following:

The materials are iteratively edited and updated as the workshop programme develops. Facilitators and participants are encouraged to make recommendations for changes and improvements. Significant problems or will be addressed as soon as they are known and a more general update of materials is made every 3-6 months (depending on the frequency and number of workshops at any given point).

Monitoring and support

All workshops are supported via regular communications with the local administrator and facilitators, as well as by a detailed reporting and feedback process. In addition our staff will monitor every fourth or fifth workshop in a series or whenever the workshops moves from one region to another. As well as helping to support facilitators and participants, this also ensures that the quality of the workshops is maintained as they cascade outwards.

In addition to the ongoing remote monitoring of workshops and periodic monitoring in person, the use of high-quality original materials, careful selection of partner facilitators, and maintenance of good lines of communication with partners all counteract the potential for information communicated in this way to become distorted.

The positive experience that we and our partners have had during these workshops means that we would actively encourage others to adopt this travelling methodology.

Benefits of the travelling methodology

So what are the benefits of adopting this kind of travelling workshop methodology? Well, there are some important benefits when compared to more traditional ICT training workshops that are often undertaken within the 'development' context. A brief summary of some of the characteristics of a more traditional approach are provided below.

Traditional ICT workshops

Many ICT training workshops that are delivered within the development context are often based on the one of more of the following approaches:

So what are the problems with this approach?

In contrast to these problems, the cascading methodology provides the following benefits.


If you have any questions or comments, or would like further information then please contact

Where we work

AuthorAID Bandwidth management country profile E-resources EIPM Evidence gender Information literacy Journals Online Librarian Library consortia LRI Open Access Policy Policy maker Research research writing Training VakaYiko viewpoint